Almost as crazy as not wanting your DNA or biometrics in government databases, amirite?
The arguments haven't changed much either. Here's "you have nothing to hide if you're not breaking the law":
> “Numbering would be an advantage to motorists who were gentlemen and drove with consideration, as it would show that they were not driving in such a way as to make them ashamed of identification”.
But this one was prescient: “It will be easy to get restrictions passed, but to remove them is the work of a lifetime,”
This is the funniest thing I've read in a long time. Makes me wonder what today's opinions will sound like, a century hence.
Almost as crazy as not wanting your DNA or biometrics in government databases, amirite?
The arguments haven't changed much either. Here's "you have nothing to hide if you're not breaking the law":
> “Numbering would be an advantage to motorists who were gentlemen and drove with consideration, as it would show that they were not driving in such a way as to make them ashamed of identification”.
But this one was prescient: “It will be easy to get restrictions passed, but to remove them is the work of a lifetime,”