Graziano_M a day ago

No way, a measure of fat around your midsection is a better predictor than height and weight, not accounting at all for composition?

  • andreareina 9 hours ago

    This is a meme that fails to understand the actual, in practice limitations of BMI. The problem is that it underdiagnoses obesity, not that it overdiagnoses it. The problem isn't the nonexistent horde of lean muscular people with BMI > 25, it's all the clinically obese people with BMI < 30 thinking that yeah they're overweight but it's not that bad, they're not obese.

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2877506/#:~:text=BM...

    • UltraSane 2 hours ago

      It doesn't take that much muscle for men to get high BMIs

    • kelipso 7 hours ago

      It's really easy for a healthy man to get BMI >25 with a few months of weight lifting. Frankly, denial and downplaying of this fact just increases skepticism of BMI and the people who say it's a relevant metric.

  • snthpy 11 hours ago

    Idk. At one point I was at 11% body fat and still had BMI over 25. (83kg and 1.82m) I don't think I've ever been BMI < 25.

tekla a day ago

If you're at the point where waist to height ratio vs BMI is something you debate about, you're already too fat

  • m463 a day ago

    the lancet article is hard to just read and says it is a better predictor.

    I imagine there are people who think they are ok, who are not, but I can't tell if it goes the other way.

BobbyTables2 20 hours ago

I’ve gained about 15 lbs from my younger days and lost 2” from the waist. Stomach sticks out now, didn’t back then.

So - progress ?!?!

Almost seems saying “floor breaking when stepped on strongly correlated with arterial blockage.”

BugsJustFindMe a day ago

They should use skeletal length instead of height to account for spine curvature disorders.

  • _aavaa_ a day ago

    They should account for the difference between the two to control for comorbidities.